Should an author kill a main character?

I’m sure those that managed to slog their way through the novels Game of Thrones (or more likely enjoyed the cinematic version in all its bloody, lusty, much more engaging glory) are familiar with the notion of an author killing off one (or countless) main characters. But I am struggling with letting one of my characters who is important to the story, to the other characters in the book, and presumably to my readers, die.

Mary Read killing her antagonist cph.3a00980.jpg

Illus. in: The Pirates Own Book, 1842

I’m so torn by this, that I haven’t actually made my mind up yet if he’s dead. His wife thinks he’s dead. The people who saw him dragged off by a wild beast into the forest after being run-through with a sword think he’s dead. But there’s a chance, just a chance, that he simply has amnesia and that’s why he’s been missing for nine months. Hey, I even believe that’s a possibility, and I’m the one who had him mauled by a beast from some other dimension or something. (Truth be told, I don’t even know for sure what these creatures are, or where they came from, or why they hauled this character off into the woods so we’d all assume he was dead–I hope I figure it out before the end of the book.)

Is it better to kill off a character so that the survivors can learn to deal with the pain, or is it too much for the reader to lose someone they’ve grown attached to? How do you feel when an author kills a character you love?

Scene on a Grave, 1859 by Vasily Grigoryevich Perov (1833-1882, Russia)

 

 

 

One thought on “Should an author kill a main character?

  1. The Masterpiece Theater shows certainly don’t flinch at killing off important characters. Although I didn’t continue watching “Downton Abbey” much longer after Mathew died in a car crash, his departure no doubt advanced the plot. I can’t say it was too sad, but his absence reduced the appeal of the show for me. Though Sybil’s death was a lot sadder, I didn’t lose interest in the show.
    The painful deaths in “Poldark” challenge the characters, add realism and new plot twists. But if Poldark himself were to be killed, I wouldn’t watch anymore. Of course if it happened in the last episode, there wouldn’t be much I could do about it, now would there?
    So, I think authors shouldn’t kill gratuitously, but with an eye to what it means to the story. How it helps or hinders the other characters in their growth. How the death may be more important to the plot than the continued influence of that character.

    Like

Got something to say? Let's hear it!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s